{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":10131733,"manufacturer":"Volvo Car USA, LLC","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"12/27/2003","dateComplaintFiled":"08/05/2005","vin":"YV1SW53DX11","components":"VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL","summary":"DT: CONSUMER  WAS  TRAVELING FROM CHARLOTTE TO CINCINNATI IN  2001 VOLVO V70 WHEN  VEHICLE SUDDENLY LOST POWER . COULD NOT DRIVE FASTER THAN 20 MPH.  WAS ABLE TO EXIT ONTO THE HIGHWAY SHOULDER. MESSAGE LIGHT SAID PERFORMANCE REDUCED,  BUT THERE WAS NO EXPLANATION FOR THIS MESSAGE IN THE SERVICE MANUAL. VOLVO ROADSIDE SERVICE CLAIMED TO BE UNAWARE OF WHAT COULD BE WRONG, AS DID THE NEAREST DEALER. AFTER TWENTY MINUTES THE CAR RESTARTED AND RAN WELL FOR TWO DAYS . THIS WAS A HOLIDAY WEEKEND AND CONSUMER COULD NOT OBTAIN SERVICE. HOWEVER, ON RETURN TRIP TO CHARLOTTE VEHICLE EXPERIENCED THE SAME FAILURE 4 OR 5 TIMES, A VERY SCARY AND DANGEROUS CONDITION FOR INTERSTATE DRIVING. WHEN CONSUME R SCHEDULED AN APPOINTMENT WITH  LOCAL DEALER SERVICE DEPARTMENT THE SERVICE MANAGER CLAIMED TO BE UNAWARE OF ANY SUCH PROBLEM WITH OTHER VOLVOS. BY THE TIME  CONSUMER ARRIVED FOR THE APPOINTMENT SHE RESEARCHED THE ISSUE ON THE INTERNET AND  LEARNED ABOUT THE ELECTRONIC THROTTLE CONTROL MODULE (ETM) FAILURE. THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT AGAIN DENIED KNOWING ABOUT THIS FAILURE  BUT ADNITTED THAT THE THROTTLE   FAILED ON  THIS VEHICLE.  IT WAS REPLACED AT A COST OF OVER $900.  CONSUMER  ATTEMPTED TO PURSUE COMPENSATION AND A RECALL DUE TO SAFETY ISSUES BUT VOLVO  REFUSED TO DISCUSS THE MATTER WITH  CONSUMER.  *AK","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2001","productMake":"VOLVO","productModel":"V70","manufacturer":"Volvo Car USA, LLC"}]}]}