{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":10132028,"manufacturer":"Ford Motor Company","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"04/30/2004","dateComplaintFiled":"09/06/2005","vin":"3FAFP3138YR","components":"SUSPENSION","summary":"DT: THE FRONT RIGHT PASSENGER SIDE COIL SPRINGS BROKE.  WHEN THIS OCCURRED IT STOPPED THE CAR AND PUNCTURED THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE.  THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A REPAIR SHOP.  THE REPAIR BILL COST $1000.   THE TIE ROD END WAS DAMAGED ALONG WITH THE STRUTS, UPPER BEARING PLATES, FRONT STABILIZER RINGS, TIRE, A NEW RIGHT SIDE AXLE, AND CONTROL ARM.  THEY WERE REPLACED. THE MECHANIC  SAID THERE WAS A CRACK IN THE FRONT COIL SPRINGS THAT  CAUSED THE AFOREMENTIONED FAILURES.   IN 11/04 THERE WAS A RECALL ON THE FRONT COIL SPRINGS AND THE CONSUMER WAS NOTIFIED BY RECALL LETTER.   RECALL REPAIRS  HAD ALREADY BEEN DONE IN APRIL WHEN THE INCIDENT OCCURRED.  CONSUMER TOOK REPAIR BILL AND RECALL LETTER TO DEALER, AND THEY SUBMITTED  IT TO FORD.  HOWEVER, FORD SENT BACK A CHECK FOR $480 BUT NOT THE $1000 THE CONSUMER SPENT.  THEY ONLY PAID FOR THE COILS AND SOME OTHER WORK, BUT CLAIMED THAT  SOME OF THE OTHER REPAIRS WERE UNNECESSARY.  THE CONSUMER WANTED TO FILE A COMPLAINT  ATTEMPTING TO FORCE  FORD TO PAY FOR ALL  REPAIRS THAT WERE DONE. *AK *JB","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2000","productMake":"FORD","productModel":"FOCUS","manufacturer":"Ford Motor Company"}]}]}