{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":10151674,"manufacturer":"General Motors, LLC","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"02/18/2006","dateComplaintFiled":"03/03/2006","vin":"2G1FP22K812","components":"SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,EQUIPMENT","summary":"MY 2001 CAMARO WITH LESS THAN 37K MILES WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR NEW BRAKES. NO REASON I TOOK CAR TO DEALERSHIP OTHER THAN I WANTED NEW BRAKES THOUGH NOTHING SQUEAKED &  I HAD NO TROUBLE.  I DID NOT EXPECT TO BE TOLD I NEEDED NEW ROTORS AS THE DEALERSHIP INFORMED ME THE CURRENT ROTORS WERE TOO THIN AND I NEEDED TO REPLACE THEM AS WELL AS THE PADS AND BRAKE LININGS.   I WAS STUNNED AS THE CAR IS HARDLY DRIVEN BUT A MERE 8 MILES ROUND TRIP TO WORK & BACK  THE LAST TWO YEARS.  I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THE OTHER CALIFORNIA DEALERSHIP CAR WAS TAKEN TOO JUST 7 MONTHS PRIOR FOR BRAKE INSPECTION AT 33,713  WOULD HAVE ADVISED OF IMPENDING ISSUE?  IN REVIEWING THE BRAKE INSPECTION PAPERWORK DATED 7/24/05  I  CLEARLY NOTICED THE TECHS LACK OF ATTENTION TO EVEN FILLING IN THE PROPER BOXES IE: BRAKE LININGS.  THE $1100 SPENT TO FIX PROBLEM IS NOT AN ISSUE.  ITS THE SAFETY ISSUE!   LOVE THE CAR & HAVE HAD 3 (95,97 & 2001) BUT AM LEARY TO DRIVE IT WITH WHAT APPEARS TO BE AN ENGINEERING PROBLEM WITH ROTOR/PADS AND GM IS IGNORING IT?  FORD IGNORED THEIR PROBLEMS WITH TIRES FOR YEARS AND HOW MANY PEOPLE DIED?  *NM","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2001","productMake":"CHEVROLET","productModel":"CAMARO","manufacturer":"General Motors, LLC"},{"type":"Equipment","productYear":"9999","productMake":"GMC","productModel":"DOOR LATCH","manufacturer":"General Motors, LLC"}]}]}