{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":10189783,"manufacturer":"Ford Motor Company","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"04/12/2007","dateComplaintFiled":"05/04/2007","vin":"1FAFP52U02A","components":"SUSPENSION","summary":"MAKE:  FORD, MODEL:  TAURUS, YEAR:  2002, I WAS TOLD BY THE MANUFACTURER OF THESE COIL SPRINGS MUBEA: THIS CONDITION HAS EXISTED SINCE 2002 FOR MY COIL SPRINGS RUSTING AND BREAKING CAUSING TIRE AND CAR DAMAGE. I SUSTAINED THIS DAMAGE PULLING OUT OF MY PARKING LOT ONTO I-75 @ 176 MILE MARKER NORTH. WHY IS THERE NOT THE SAME RECALL AS THE ONE LISTED BELOW. I KEEP MY CAR IN TOP RUNNING ORDER. THIS IS NOT FAIR WHEN THE MANUFACTURER IS WELL AWARE OF THIS CONDITION! I SPENT 536.00 TO REPLACE THE RIGHT SIDE AT AIRPORT FORD NOT COUNTING THE NEW TIRE. I WANT THE OTHER SIDE LEFT SIDE REPLACED BY FORD. E.G.:NHTSA ACTION NUMBER:  PE05054  SUMMARY: THE OFFICE OF DEFECT INVESTIGATION (ODI) OPENED PRELIMINARY EVALUATION, PE05-054, BASED ON 131 VEHICLE OWNER QUESTIONNAIRES RELATED TO ALLEGED REAR COIL SPRING FRACTURES. SINCE OPENING THE INVESTIGATION THERE HAVE BEEN AN ADDITIONAL SIXTY-THREE (63) COMPLAINTS ALLEGING REAR COIL SPRING FRACTURE. AN ANALYSIS OF THE VEHICLE OWNER QUESTIONNAIRES (VOQS) SUBMITTED TO ODI REVEALS THAT 42% OF THE COMPLAINANTS ALLEGE THAT THE ADJACENT TIRE WAS PUNCTURED AS RESULT OF A REAR COIL SPRING FRACTURE. ADDITIONALLY, AN ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLAINT DATA RECEIVED BY ODI FROM FORD REVEALS THE FOLLOWING: THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 553 UNIQUE VEHICLE COMPLAINTS OF COIL SPRING FRACTURE. 30% OF THE COMPLAINTS ALLEGE THAT THE REAR COIL SPRING FRACTURE RESULTED IN THE ADJACENT TIRE BEING PUNCTURED. AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS (EA06-002) IS BEING OPENED TO FURTHER EXAMINE THE POTENTIAL SAFETY IMPLICATIONS OF THE REAR COIL SPRING FRACTURES AS RELATED TO TIRE PUNCTURES.  *TR","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2002","productMake":"FORD","productModel":"TAURUS","manufacturer":"Ford Motor Company"}]}]}