{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":10283382,"manufacturer":"UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"06/15/2009","dateComplaintFiled":"09/09/2009","vin":"","components":"SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC,EQUIPMENT","summary":"I RECENTLY HAD TO HAVE MY FRONT BRAKE ROTORS CHANGED.  UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN ROUTINE OPERATOR MAINTENANCE.  THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE ROTORS THAT HAD TO BE CHANGED ONLY HAD 19,000 MILES ON THEM UNDER VERY EASY DRIVING CONDITIONS.  WHEN THE OLD ROTORS WERE REMOVED THEY LOOKED LIKE THEY HAD BEEN USED UNDER EXTREME DRIVING CONDITIONS.  FOR THE NORMAL DRIVER THIS COULD HAVE BEEN A VERY DANGEEROUS SITUATION.  I HAVE A MECHANICS BACKGROUND AND REALIZED THAT SOMETHING WAS WRONG EARLY ON AND WAS ABLE TO PREVENT ANYTHING DANGEROUS FROM HAPPENING.  THESE ROTORS WERE LITERALLY FALLING APART.  THE SURFACES WERE CHIPPING OFF AND THE FINS IN THE CENTER WERE RUSTING THRU AFTER ONLY 19,000 MILES.  THEY LOOKED LIKE ROTORS THAT HAD AT LEAST 3 TIMES THAT AMOUNT OF WEAR AND TEAR ON THEM.  THESE ROTORS WERE TURNED OVER TO THE ENGINEERS AT VRTC SO THAT THEY COULD TAKE A CLOSE LOOK AT THEM.  THE ENGINEERS NAME IS BILL COLLINS(NHTSA).  HE HAS THE MANUFACTURERS INFORMATION AND I CAN PROVIDE HIM WITH A COPY OF THE REPAIR RECIEPT THAT WILL VERIFY THE AMOUNT OF MILES THE WERE ON THE ROTORS. *TR","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"9999","productMake":"UNKNOWN","productModel":"UNKNOWN","manufacturer":"UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER"},{"type":"Equipment","productYear":"9999","productMake":"WAGNER","productModel":"WAGNER","manufacturer":"MCGRAW"}]}]}