{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":10310086,"manufacturer":"Mazda Motor Corp.","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"02/10/2010","dateComplaintFiled":"02/12/2010","vin":"4F2YU08122K","components":"SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC","summary":"2002 MAZDA TRIBUTE.  A RECALL WAS ORDERED BY NHTSA ON 95,000 VEHICLES. MAZDA RECALL #07V15700 IN APRIL 2007.  THE RECALL, ACCORDING TO MAZDA DID NOT INCLUDE MY VIN#.  HOWEVER THE CAUSE OF THE RECALL HAS PLAYED OUT WITH MY DAUGHTERS VEHICLE AND NOW IT APPEARS THAT I AM GOING TO BE STUCK FOR THE COST TO REPAIR.  THE RESULT OF THIS EQUIPMENT FAILURE DID NOT RESULT IN BODILY HARM BUT IT WILL RESULT IN OVER $2,000 IN REPAIR COSTS.  HOW DID NHTSA ARRIVE AT THE CONCLUSION THAT THE PROBLEM HAD BEEN RESOLVED BY THE MANUFACTURER? WHY WOULD MY DAUGHTERS VEHICLE NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKE CONTROL MODULE FAILS RESULTING IN A FAILURE OF THE CARS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM INCLUDING THE ANTI-LOCK BANKING SYSTEM. THE SAME SMOKING AND ELECTRICAL DRAW THAT NECESSITATED THE RECALL REFERENCED ABOVE WAS OBSERVED BY MY MECHANIC. WE LIVE IN A FAIRLY RURAL AREA AND THIS DEFECT WHICH LED TO A FAILED BATTERY AND A FAILED ALTERNATOR COULD EASILY HAVE PLACED MY DAUGHTER IN A BAD SITUATION. MAZDA DENIED THAT THIS VEHICLE IS INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. *TR","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2002","productMake":"MAZDA","productModel":"TRIBUTE","manufacturer":"Mazda Motor Corp."}]}]}