{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":10320331,"manufacturer":"General Motors, LLC","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"02/15/2009","dateComplaintFiled":"03/16/2010","vin":"1GNDS13S922","components":"VISIBILITY","summary":"THE 2002 TRAILBLAZER HAD A RECALL ON THE WINDSHIELD WIPER MOTOR AND THE POSSIBILITY OF DAMAGE THAT WATER INSIDE THE MOTOR COULD CAUSE.  THE CORRECTION WAS PERFORMED BY PLUGGING A HOLE IN THE MOTOR.  MY VEHICLE WAS ALSO UNDER A GMPP EXTENDED WARRANTY.  SHORTLY LATER, THE WIPERS BEGAN TO MALFUNCTION WHILE ON INTERMITTENT.  THEY STUTTER AND SOMETIMES STOP IN MID STROKE, UNLESS ON HIGH SPEED.      I RESEARCHED THE INTERNET AND FOUND NUMEROUS SIMILAR COMPLAINTS THAT WERE CAUSED BY WATER DAMAGE THAT HAD OCCURRED.  I INQUIRED AT THE DEALER ABOUT CORRECTING AND THEY STATED THAT SINCE THE RECALL HAD BEEN PERFORMED, THEY COULD REPAIR THE UNIT ONLY IF I PAID FOR THE REPAIRS.  THE ESTIMATED COST WAS AROUND $350.  ADDITIONAL INTERNET RESEARCH INDICATES NUMEROUS OTHER COMPLAINTS THAT HAVE BEEN CORRECTED BY OPENING THE WIPER MOTOR AND CLEANING THE CONTACTS - A RESULT OF WATER DAMAGE, OBVIOUSLY CAUSED EVEN THOUGH THE RECALL.  I BELIEVE CHEVROLET SHOULD RECALL THIS VEHICLE AND REPLACE THE WIPER MOTOR RATHER THAN PLUG THE HOLE AS THEY DID ORIGINALLY.  I ALSO BELIEVE CHEVROLET KNEW THEIR ORIGINAL RECALL (PLUGGING THE HOLE) WOULD NOT LAST AND MOTORS WOULD FAIL AT A LATER TIME.  UPDATED 04/12/10","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2002","productMake":"CHEVROLET","productModel":"TRAILBLAZER","manufacturer":"General Motors, LLC"}]}]}