{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":10507426,"manufacturer":"Toyota Motor Corporation","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"02/15/2012","dateComplaintFiled":"04/07/2013","vin":"JT3VN39W8R0","components":"POWER TRAIN,UNKNOWN OR OTHER,ENGINE","summary":"A COUPLE OF YEARS AFTER PURCHASING THIS TOYOTA 4-RUNNER THERE WAS A RECALL DUE TO FAULTY HEAD GASKETS.  THEY LEAKED.  A RECALL WAS (SUPPOSEDLY) DONE.  100,000 MILES LATER THE SAME PROBLEM HAD TO BE FIXED AGAIN.  I CONTACTED TOYOTA AND WAS INFORMED THAT THEY WERE ONLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ONE FIX.  THAT WOULD BE NICE IF THEY HAD ACTUALLY FIXED IT.  A (FIX) IMPLIES THAT IT HAS BEEN REALLY FIXED.  HEAD GASKETS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO LEAK . . . EVER!  SO I AM WONDERING OF THEY REALLY ACCOMPLISHED A FIX THE FIRST TIME.  OBVIOUSLY NOT SINCE IT COST ME $2000 TO GET IT FIXED AGAIN FOR THE EXACT SAME PROBLEM.  IF THEY DID ATTEMPT A FIX THEY CERTAINLY MUST HAVE USED INFERIOR OF DEFECTIVE PARTS SINCE THE SAME PROBLEM NEEDED TO BE FIXED AGAIN.  I THINK THERE OUGHT TO BE A LAW THAT IF A RECALL (FIX) FAILS AND NEED TO BE DONE OVER THE MANUFACTURER SHOULD BE LIABLE FOR THE REDO.  THANK YOU  *TR","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"1994","productMake":"TOYOTA","productModel":"4RUNNER","manufacturer":"Toyota Motor Corporation"}]}]}