{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":10553063,"manufacturer":"Toyota Motor Corporation","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"11/05/2013","dateComplaintFiled":"11/20/2013","vin":"5TDBT44A52S","components":"STRUCTURE","summary":"TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2002 TOYOTA SEQUOIA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT AFTER BEING SERVICE UNDER A MANUFACTURER'S RECALL FOR FRAME CORROSION, THE SWAY BAR BECAME FRACTURED AND A HOLE WAS FOUND IN THE FRAME DUE TO EXCESSIVE CORROSION. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE THE TECHNICIAN VERIFIED THE FAILURE AND ADVISED THE CONSUMER TOYOTA DENIED THE REPLACEMENT FRAME. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 199,000.  UPDATED 01/07/14*LJ  THE CONSUMER STATED HE HAD THE VEHICLE INSPECTED EARLY ON, AND WAS INFORMED NO RUST WAS PRESENT, AND THE VEHICLE WAS GIVEN AN UNDERCOAT TREATMENT TO THE FRAME AS OPPOSED TO A REPLACEMENT. SEVERAL MONTHS LATER, WHILE ON A TRIP, THE CONSUMER HEARD A SIGNIFICANT NOISE AND VIBRATION WHILE TURNING AND GOING OVER BUMPS. UPON HIS RETURN HOME, HE TOOK THE VEHICLE T HIS MECHANIC, WHERE HE WAS INFORMED THE SWAY BAR HAD DETACHED FROM THE FRAME. HE INFORMED THE CONSUMER THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT RUST IN THE FRAME CREATING A HOLE AND  THE SWAY BAR COULD NOT BE RE-ATTACHED. THE CONSUMER BELIEVED THE UNDERCOAT TREATMENT THE VEHICLE WAS GIVEN WAS INEFFECTIVE IN INHIBITING FURTHER RUST. THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THE UNDERCOAT INHIBITOR APPLIED TO HIS VEHICLE WAS NO LONGER USED DUE TO A SHORT SHELF LIFE. UPDATE 01/09/14","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2002","productMake":"TOYOTA","productModel":"SEQUOIA","manufacturer":"Toyota Motor Corporation"}]}]}