{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":10700595,"manufacturer":"Ford Motor Company","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"03/18/2015","dateComplaintFiled":"03/20/2015","vin":"2FAHP71W75X","components":"STEERING","summary":"I RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE IN FEBRUARY 2015 AND BROUGHT MY CAR TO A DEALERSHIP FOR REPAIRS ON MARCH 18, 2015. THE SERVICE MANAGER OF THAT BRANCH INFORMED ME THAT THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH THE UPPER STEERING COLUMN BEARINGS THAT AREN'T COVERED BY THE RECALL. HE SAID HE SPOKE TO THE RECALL CENTER AND THE REASON THEY GAVE WAS BECAUSE THIS RECALL WAS ISSUED IN 2013 AND I DIDN'T RESPOND IN TIME. I DID NOT RECEIVE A LETTER AND IF I DID, I CERTAINLY WOULD'VE RESPONDED IN A TIMELY WAY.     THEN I SPOKE TO THE RECALL CENTER AND ARGUED THAT THIS UPPER COLUMN PROBLEM IS A DIRECT RESULT OF THE LOWER COLUMN SHAFT; TO WHICH I WAS TOLD THAT TYPICALLY FORD ONLY COVERS WHAT'S EXPLICITLY DETAILED IN THE RECALL NOTICE. ALSO, I WAS TOLD, THE REASON FOR MY ISSUES WITH THE LETTER MAY BE BECAUSE THE NJ MVC HAS BEEN SLOW IN DISSEMINATING DRIVER INFORMATION TO CAR COMPANIES. IF THAT'S THE CASE, IT'S ABSOLUTELY UNFAIR AND UNREASONABLE TO HOLD ME RESPONSIBLE FOR A BUREAUCRATIC ISSUE OF COMMUNICATION.     THIS ARGUMENT MIGHT NOT BE TOO VALID, BUT THERE IS A RECALL ISSUED BY NHTSA REGARDING IMPROPER REPAIRS OF THE UPPER STEERING COLUMN SHAFT. THIS SUGGESTS TO ME THAT THERE IS A PROBLEM IN GENERAL WITH STEERING COLUMN SHAFTS, SO I THINK MY REPAIRS SHOULD BE COVERED.     I TOLD THE SERVICE MANAGER TO JUST FIX WHAT'S COVERED AND I'LL TAKE WHATEVER RISKS AFTERWARDS. I DON'T HAVE THE MONEY FOR THOSE REPAIRS AND, OUT OF PRINCIPLE, I DON'T THINK I SHOULD BE LIABLE FOR THOSE COSTS.   *TR","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2005","productMake":"FORD","productModel":"CROWN VICTORIA","manufacturer":"Ford Motor Company"}]}]}