{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":10714933,"manufacturer":"Chrysler (FCA US, LLC)","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"05/06/2015","dateComplaintFiled":"05/06/2015","vin":"1J4GW48S82C","components":"SEAT BELTS","summary":"RE NHTSA CASE [XXX]:     NHTSA REFERRED ME TO FCA TODAY ABOUT RECALL NOTICE R06. FCA HAD MAILED A IMPORTANT SAFETY RECALL NOTICE (R06) IN FEB INDICATING THEY WOULD WRITE LATER REGARDING WHEN PARTS ARE AVAILABLE.  FCA'S  AMANDA AQ070 INDICATED TODAY THE REMEDY STILL IS BEING RESEARCHED. THIS MAY NOW. THE FEB NOTICE INDICATED THE PARTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE AND \"EVERY EFFORT WOULD BE MADE TO OBTAIN THESE PARTS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE\" AND I WOULD BE NOTIFIED WHEN THE PARTS ARE AVAILABLE\". IT APPEARS THEN THAT FCA HAS COMPLETELY MISLED ME BY INDICATING IN THE FEBRUARY LETTER THAT A PERMANENT REMEDY REQUIRES PARTS AND THEY WOULD NOTIFY ME WHEN THEY ARE AVAILABLE. HOW COULD THEY MAKE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN PARTS IF THE REMEDY IS STILL BEING RESEARCHED?  I HAVE RECEIVED NO COMMUNICATION WHATSOEVER FROM FCA ABOUT ANY PARTS TO REMEDY THE R06 RECALL.   I READ IN THE NEWSPAPER RECENTLY THAT FCA HAS BEEN VERY SLOW TO REMEDY PAST RECALLS. I SUBMIT THAT THIS IS CLEARLY A GOOD EXAMPLE OF HOW THEY MISLEAD AND DELAY IN ORDER TO AVOID COVERING THEIR COST TO RECALL AND REPAIR AND MAKE THEIR PRODUCTS SAFE FOR THE PUBLIC. THE FAVOR OF A REPLY WOULD BE APPRECIATED FROM NHTSA BUT ESPECIALLY FCA.   *TR","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2002","productMake":"JEEP","productModel":"GRAND CHEROKEE","manufacturer":"Chrysler (FCA US, LLC)"}]}]}