{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":10762802,"manufacturer":"General Motors, LLC","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"09/10/2015","dateComplaintFiled":"09/10/2015","vin":"1G6DX67D960","components":"FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM","summary":"THIS COMPLAINT PERTAINS TO GM RECALL #14405-2.  ALSO LISTED UNDER THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER OF 14V542.      HERE IS MY ISSUE:     WHEN A MANUFACTURER, IN THIS CASE CADILLAC, ISSUES A RECALL THAT IS AN INCONVENIENCE TO THEIR CUSTOMERS, WHY DOESN'T THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRE THEM TO GIVE A LOANER CAR AND/OR ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION TO THE VEHICLE OWNER TO COVER THE COST AND HASSLE OF TAKING OFF WORK AND GETTING A RENTAL CAR TO USE?      I ASKED THE DEALERSHIP, THE CADILLAC CUSTOMER SERVICE LINE REPRESENTATIVE, AHMED, AND THE CADILLAC CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, MICHELLE FOR A LOANER CAR AND THE REQUEST WAS DENIED.  I THINK THAT AS PART OF THE COST OF RECALLS THE MANUFACTURER SHOULD LIMIT THE CUSTOMER'S INCONVENIENCE TO AN ABSOLUTE MINIMUM.  PLEASE CONSIDER REQUIRING MANUFACTURERS TO PROVIDE A LOANER CAR WHEN A RECALL IS ISSUED IN THE FUTURE.  THIS IS NOT A \"FREE\" REPAIR IF I HAVE TO TAKE TIME OFF OF WORK AND PAY FOR A RENTAL CAR.  ALSO THE NEED FOR THIS REPAIR HAS BEEN DETERMINED BY THE GOVERNMENT AND/OR THE MANUFACTURER'S LAWYERS SO THAT FURTHER COST AND LAWSUITS WILL NOT BE INCURRED.  YOU WOULD THINK THAT THE MANUFACTURER WOULD WANT TO LIMIT DELAYS IN GETTING REPAIRS DONE DUE TO ADDITIONAL COSTS AND INCONVENIENCE TO THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE.","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2006","productMake":"CADILLAC","productModel":"STS","manufacturer":"General Motors, LLC"}]}]}