{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":11011990,"manufacturer":"Toyota Motor Corporation","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"07/04/2017","dateComplaintFiled":"08/01/2017","vin":"JTDKB20U677","components":"EXTERIOR LIGHTING","summary":"TAKATA ISSUE:  I AM FILING THIS COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF CAELA ERICKSON, MY SEVENTEEN-YEAR OLD GRAND-DAUGHTER.  THE VEHICLE WAS RECENTLY PURCHASED USED AS HER FIRST-VEHICLE.  THE FIRST TIME SHE DROVE IT AT NIGHT, THE HEADLIGHTS DIMMED AND THEN ACTUALLY TURNED OF!  THIS WAS WHILE SHE WAS DRIVING ON A DARK AND WINDING BACK ROAD HERE IN THE OJAI VALLEY ON A BUSY HOLIDAY WEEKEND.  THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION AND ONE THAT COULD HAVE HAD TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES.      WHEN WE TOOK THE VEHICLE INTO THE LOCAL DEALERSHIP, WE WERE INFORMED THAT THERE HAD BEEN A CLASS ACTION SUIT SETTLEMENT YEARS BEFORE AND THAT, ALTHOUGH THE CAR HAD BEEN SOLD USED TO THE PREVIOUS OWNER THROUGH ANOTHER DEALERSHIP, THE REPAIR WORK HAD NOT BEEN DONE.  WE WERE INFORMED THAT THE WORK REQUIRED TO COMPLETELY REPLACE BOTH HEADLIGHT SYSTEMS...WORK THAT MUST BE DONE TO MAKE THE CAR SAFE TO DRIVE AND THAT WILL COST NEARLY $1000.00...IS NO LONGER COVERED.    THIS IS TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE.  IF THE PROBLEM WAS BAD ENOUGH TO BE COVERED IN A CLASS-ACTION SUIT, WHY DIDN'T THE ORIGINAL DEALERSHIP INSURE THAT THE VEHICLE WAS SAFE PRIOR TO RE-SELLING IT?  IT SEEMS TO ME THAT AS THE SALES END OF THE TOYOTA CORPORATION, IT WAS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO HAVE CORRECTED THIS DANGEROUS PROBLEM PRIOR TO PUTTING IT BACK ON THE ROAD.  I BELIEVE THIS INCIDENT IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHY THIS PROBLEM NEEDS TO BE UP-GRADED TO A RECALL!  THERE SHOULD NOT BE A TIME LIMIT ON SAFETY ISSUES AND CONSUMERS SHOULD NOT BE PLACED IN DANGER AND/OR HAVE TO FOOT THE BILL FOR TOYOTA'S DECISION TO PURCHASE SUB-PAR PRODUCTS FROM TAKATA.","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2007","productMake":"TOYOTA","productModel":"PRIUS","manufacturer":"Toyota Motor Corporation"}]}]}