{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":11170765,"manufacturer":"General Motors, LLC","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"01/18/2019","dateComplaintFiled":"01/18/2019","vin":"LRBFXESX1GD","components":"UNKNOWN OR OTHER","summary":"SINCE 2016 MY VEHICLE COLLISION ALERT HAS BEEN INOPERABLE AND GIVING FALSE ALERTS.. ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS, I HAD VEHICLES IGNORE THE YIELD SIGN AT HIGH RATE OF SPEED CUTTING IN FROM ON MY VEHICLE NEARLY CAUSING AN ACCIDENT.  THE COLLISION ALERT NEVER WENT OFF UNTIL 45 MINUTES TO AN HOUR LATER...MY VEHICLE HAS BEEN TAKEN TO THE KENT COUNTY MOTOR BUICK DEALERSHIP IN DOVER, DE WHERE IT WAS PURCHASED FOR SERVICE.  NUMEROUS TIMES THEY COULD NOT PINPOINT THE ISSUE. GM ENGINEER WAS NOTIFIED BY THE DEALERSHIP TO ASCERTAIN ASSISTANCE AND I WAS INFORMED BY THE SERVICE DEPT. THAT IT MAY RECOGNIZE AN ALERT AND IT MAY NOT RECOGNIZE AN ALERT.  FOR THE LAST 3 YEARS I'VE BEEN DEALING WITH THIS ISSUE.  IN JAN OF 2019, I PERSONALLY CONTACTED GM TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THE ONGOING ISSUE.  THEY GAVE ME A CASE#9-4980258634 AND TO RETURN THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALERSHIP. THE DEALERSHIP UPGRADED THE SOFTER WARE AND ATTEMPTED TO DUPLICATE THE ISSUE BUT TO NO AVAIL.  THE COLLISION ALERT FAILED.  GM SENIOR ADVISOR PAIGE CALLED ME INDICATING \"THE VEHICLE WAS DESIGNED TO DO WHAT IS SUPPOSE TO DO\" AND THE VEHICLE WAS SAFE.  I QUESTIONED MS. PAIGE AND ASKED HER HOW CAN MY VEHICLE BE SAFE WHEN THE VEHICLE COLLISION ALERT IS NOT FUNCTIONALLY LIKE IT SUPPOSE TO.  ALL SHE CAN SAY IS VEHICLE IS DESIGNED TO DO WHAT IT'S SUPPOSE TO DO.  I INFORMED MS. PAIGE THAT WAS UNACCEPTABLE AND GM NEEDS TO ALERT CONSUMER OF THE FAULTY COLLISION ALERT.  SHE CONTINUED SAYING GM CAN NOT DO ANYTHING FOR ME BECAUSE \"IT IS DESIGNED TO DO WHAT IS WAS SUPPOSE TO DO\".","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2016","productMake":"BUICK","productModel":"ENVISION","manufacturer":"General Motors, LLC"}]}]}