{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":11554190,"manufacturer":"Toyota Motor Corporation","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"11/04/2023","dateComplaintFiled":"11/08/2023","vin":"JTDKB20U683","components":"SERVICE BRAKES","summary":"I was shocked to find out that Toyota appears to be falsifying data in order to get out of paying to repair safety problems with their cars. Hiding safety issues may have already led to injuries and death.  We bought a 2008 Toyota Prius in 2014. The title with Virginia DMV is dated 08/01/14.  On November 4, 2023, after several indicator lights showed up, I found out from my garage that the car's anti-lock braking system was defective and not working. However, according to the garage manager, Toyota had acknowledged a defect with their anti-lock braking system. There had been a recall some years ago for this part on the 2008 Prius, but it was no longer in effect.  On November 6, 2023, Brittany at Toyota told me the same thing.  Toyota acknowledged in 2016 that there was a problem with the anti-lock braking system with this model of car, and that it would be replaced for free by Toyota. This was a \"customer support program\" rather than a recall.  However, according to Brittany, the notice of this \"customer support program\" was not mailed to us. It was mailed to the previous owner, who owned it before 2014. We never received it.  Of course, the dates do not work. We bought the car in 2014, and the notice went out in 2016. There was no reason to send the notice to someone who didn't own the car.  Brittany, pretty innocently, had revealed that Toyota is falsifying records. She said that Toyota is using state DMV records to find car owners and send notices of faulty and dangerous parts. However, this is obviously not true. Virginia DMV issued our title to the car on 08/01/14, well before the recall.  The only way I can see this happening is if Toyota is falsifying records so that they have to pay to fix far fewer cars. This practice could easily lead to injury and death. There would appear to be a notification mailing, with a postage bill to prove it, but it could have been at least partly fabricated by using past owners instead of current owners.  If Toyota had not falsi","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2008","productMake":"TOYOTA","productModel":"PRIUS","manufacturer":"Toyota Motor Corporation"}]}]}