{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":11682713,"manufacturer":"Chrysler (FCA US, LLC)","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"08/22/2025","dateComplaintFiled":"08/24/2025","vin":"3C6URVJG0KE","components":"POWER TRAIN","summary":"Transmission oil leak on my 2019 Dodge Promaster 3500 van - please see attached: pdf 1 Safety Recall 61A info,  pdf 2 for Bud Clary recall work done,  pdf 3 for when leak 1st seen at Tacoma Dodge, and  pdfs 4&5 for fix at Tacoma Dodge  On [XXX], odometer 39,764 mi, Safety Recall 61A done (debris in the transmission may prevent the park pawl from fully engaging, which could cause the vehicle to roll away. ) by  Bud Clary Dodge, 2925 Auburn Way N., Auburn, WA 98002 (253) 833-2485    On [XXX], odometer 49,672 miles, at engine oil change,  transmission oil leak noted by  Tacoma Dodge, 4101 S. Tacoma Way, Tacoma, WA 98409 (253) 475-7300  On [XXX], odometer 51,582 Tacoma Dodge verified transmission oil leak, transmission service done to replace oil and reseal leaking pan. A test drive showed additional leak at upper transmission pan and that was resealed and passed 2nd test drive showing no leaks.  I was charged $256.70 for a \"transmission service\", normally part of scheduled maintenance at 60,000 miles, and not associated with leaks. I believe I should not be charged for this since the leakage was seen after only (about) 10,000 miles after the transmission serviced for the recall. There are known issues with the RTV sealant used leaking if not not installed correctly.  I am also concerned if the Safety Recall 61A was implemented properly. Not clear how to verify that.  INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2019","productMake":"RAM","productModel":"PROMASTER","manufacturer":"Chrysler (FCA US, LLC)"}]}]}