{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":11728333,"manufacturer":"Toyota Motor Corporation","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"03/31/2026","dateComplaintFiled":"03/31/2026","vin":"5TBRT34173S","components":"UNKNOWN OR OTHER","summary":"I own a 2003 Toyota Tundra (VIN: [XXX] ) that was subject to Toyota\u2019s frame corrosion recall (Limited Service Campaign A0F).  The vehicle was inspected by Toyota in January 2011 and confirmed to have no perforation. In March 2012, Toyota applied a corrosion-resistant compound as part of the recall remedy.  Despite this, by May 2013, a structural component (spare tire carrier) failed due to severe rust and detached from the vehicle. This occurred shortly after Toyota performed the corrosion protection treatment.  This raises concerns that the recall remedy was not effective in preventing continued structural deterioration. Frame corrosion can impact vehicle safety, especially if critical components weaken or detach.  Toyota has declined any further review or assistance, stating the program has expired, despite evidence that the corrosion continued after their repair.  I am submitting this complaint to request investigation into the long-term effectiveness of the corrosion protection remedy applied under this recall program. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2003","productMake":"TOYOTA","productModel":"TUNDRA","manufacturer":"Toyota Motor Corporation"}]}]}