{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":11743300,"manufacturer":"Nissan North America, Inc.","crash":false,"fire":true,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"06/10/2026","dateComplaintFiled":"06/10/2026","vin":"KNMAT2MTXHP","components":"ELECTRICAL SYSTEM","summary":"Issue: Garage caught fire. All wood (trusses, joists, walls) were in tact. Estimated in tact amount=99%. The vehicle was completely consumed. The hood melted, plastic, seats, tires consumed. Car was not driven day of incident.  Origin was attributed to garage. Cause was undetermined by fire department. Report does not today address the vehicle in any way shape or form. There is no documentation as to what was seen upon removing garage doors. Had the can already been consumed? Did vehicle initially encapsulate the fire prior to moving into garage structure?  It is speculated that NHTSA part 573 recall report 22V-875 may be applicable when viewed from design engineering point of view and not strictly to only vehicles addressed by Nissan in that report.  There were no prior warnings of any kind that foretold the ensuing events.   I am trying to get the fire department to amend report to record stated belief of fire origin (vehicle) which is not today evidenced in the report and as per the stated opinion  by one of the fire fighters.   I am further insisting that the insurance company assign a forensic expert in evaluating the origin and cause of the fire.  Nissan has not been notified to date.  I am imploring NHTSA to take this apparent prior documented safety issue further beyond what has been concluded in order to prevent any future safety issues should it so be judged by NHTSA as the authority in these matters.","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2017","productMake":"NISSAN","productModel":"ROGUE","manufacturer":"Nissan North America, Inc."}]}]}