{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":11762430,"manufacturer":"General Motors, LLC","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"08/21/2026","dateComplaintFiled":"09/06/2026","vin":"1GKS2DKL8PR","components":"ENGINE,FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM","summary":"The check-engine light first appeared at approximately 42,000 miles. I dropped the vehicle off at the dealership on August 22 and picked it up on September 1. Within TWO MILES of leaving the dealership, the check-engine light came right back on.  The dealership initially diagnosed the problem as a lifter and wiring-harness failure. They later determined that the #7 oil-lifter solenoid had an internal short, and the wiring harness was replaced because of damage related to that short.  What I still don’t have is an answer to the most important question: What actually caused the failure?  Based on everything I’ve read about the problems surrounding GM’s 6.2L engines, I’m concerned this is only the beginning. These are extremely expensive vehicles—with monthly payments that can rival a mortgage—and owners shouldn’t have to wonder whether the engine is going to become an ongoing problem at 42,000 miles.  Extending the warranty is helpful, but it doesn’t address the underlying issue or restore confidence in the vehicle. If these 6.2L engines have a known systemic defect, GM should be required to provide a permanent solution—whether that means replacing the affected engines or offering owners a fair buyback.  Consumers paid a premium price. They should be able to expect a premium vehicle that is dependable.","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2023","productMake":"GMC","productModel":"YUKON","manufacturer":"General Motors, LLC"}]}]}