{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":11766627,"manufacturer":"Chrysler (FCA US, LLC)","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"09/21/2026","dateComplaintFiled":"09/24/2026","vin":"3C6LRVVG5ME","components":"POWER TRAIN","summary":"My 2021 Ram ProMaster experienced transmission failure and became inoperable. It is subject to Safety Recall 44A/NHTSA 23V-301 involving the 62TE transmission. Before going to Ram, an independent repair facility removed the transmission pan and documented burnt fluid and substantial metallic debris/shavings. The van was then TOWED to an authorized Ram dealer specifically because of the transmission failure and recall. Importantly, the PCM software update had NOT been performed before the failure. Ram performed the update only AFTER the transmission had already failed and metal had been documented. FCA originally identified the software update as an INTERIM repair that did not complete the recall. The current remedy includes PCM updating AND inspection and, if necessary, replacement of the transmission/components.  I informed the service manager of the documented metal and offered the independent shop's findings. He said he would not accept the finding because he had not personally inspected it, yet refused to further evaluate the transmission under the recall unless I authorized approximately $500 in customer-paid diagnosis. He repeatedly complained that Stellantis only pays approximately 1/2 hour for the recall.  After updating the PCM, the dealer drove the van approximately one mile. The manager acknowledged a transmission issue and abnormal noise and suggested it “may be a pump,” but still did not inspect the documented internal debris. He stated that because the van still moves in reverse, transmission replacement is not warranted under the recall.  I was instructed to retrieve the vehicle with the transmission issue unresolved. I have also opened a case with Ram/Stellantis. I request NHTSA review whether Recall 44A was properly completed when the transmission had already failed before the software update, metallic debris was documented, and the dealer declined further recall evaluation without customer-paid diagnosis.","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2021","productMake":"RAM","productModel":"PROMASTER","manufacturer":"Chrysler (FCA US, LLC)"}]}]}