{"count":1,"message":"Results returned successfully","results":[{"odiNumber":11775187,"manufacturer":"Ford Motor Company","crash":false,"fire":false,"numberOfInjuries":0,"numberOfDeaths":0,"dateOfIncident":"11/02/2026","dateComplaintFiled":"11/02/2026","vin":"2FABP7BV7BX","components":"STEERING","summary":"Ford is refusing to honor the 14S25 Recall. The recall was completed XXX9. The part appears to be the same and research supports this. How does replacing the same faulty part solve the problem? How is that considered a repair?  \"On your vehicle, it may be possible that the upper intermediate steering shaft was serviced incorrectly during previous repairs for Safety Recall 13S08 or Regional Program 13R01.\"  - I take it as the recall was serviced incorrectly since one can be mistaken it wasn't serviced at all. Regardless, this is a safety issue and it is unacceptable it is being ignored considering no improvements were made to the design. What difference does it make replacing the part with another faulty part two years after manufacture when now the car is 15 years old?  The part is certainly in worse condition now and I fear the safety of highway travel going forward. Ford doesn't seem to have any compassion.  Please let me know if you would like photos to be sent in. I am willing to provide images of the corroded part that can fail anytime soon.  NHTSA Bulletin: [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)","products":[{"type":"Vehicle","productYear":"2011","productMake":"FORD","productModel":"CROWN VICTORIA","manufacturer":"Ford Motor Company"}]}]}